<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jemery.com &#187; web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jemery.com/tag/web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jemery.com</link>
	<description>Jesse&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>APIs should have test error endpoints</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/12/13/apis-should-have-test-error-endpoints/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/12/13/apis-should-have-test-error-endpoints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yourtrove]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the time, when you start coding against an API, either with or without an API client, you end up producing enough errors that your error-checking is fairly robust. However, sometimes most or even everything &#8220;just works.&#8221; Which produces a conundrum: You now have no idea how robust your error handling is (or is&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/12/13/apis-should-have-test-error-endpoints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Python logging tutorial &#124; Pingbacks</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/15/python-logging-tutorial-pingbacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/15/python-logging-tutorial-pingbacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the easiest-to-follow of the various Python logging guides/posts/docs that I&#8217;ve seen: Python logging tutorial &#124; Pingbacks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/15/python-logging-tutorial-pingbacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Identity, SSO, and networked namespaces</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/13/identity-sso-and-networked-namespaces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/13/identity-sso-and-networked-namespaces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud valeski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oauth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single sign on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jud Valeski had a notable observation about how potentially powerful an OS level namespace and single sign-on capability could be for internetworked applications: Everyone&#8217;s talking about the power of Twitter and Apple&#8217;s native single sign-on model in iOS 5. While this is a phenomenal coup for both Twitter and Apple, it&#8217;s only the tip of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/13/identity-sso-and-networked-namespaces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the sorry state of American education actually good for software innovation?</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/12/is-the-sorry-state-of-american-education-actually-good-for-software-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/12/is-the-sorry-state-of-american-education-actually-good-for-software-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a bit in the realm of pointless mind games and Devil&#8217;s Advocate, so grain of salt applies. It struck me that America&#8217;s currently abhorrent state of education may, in an odd, counterproductive way actually be helping to fuel software innovation. Imagine you&#8217;re a smart student being put through the low-expectations, rote-memorization wringer&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/12/is-the-sorry-state-of-american-education-actually-good-for-software-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few great things to read on REST (technical)</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/06/28/a-few-great-things-to-read-on-rest-technical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/06/28/a-few-great-things-to-read-on-rest-technical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not sure how I missed this post by Jacob Kaplan-Moss, where he&#8217;s throwing the kind of REST question out there that has, in the past kept me thinking for hours: It seems like URIs like /people/{my-uid}/photos and /people/{my-uid}/photos/{photo-id} are more “pure.” But now that’s weird because only one single user ever has access to a given URI (e.g&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/06/28/a-few-great-things-to-read-on-rest-technical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Things Ive Learned at South by Southwest This Year</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/03/16/7-things-ive-learned-at-south-by-southwest-this-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/03/16/7-things-ive-learned-at-south-by-southwest-this-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ned vizzini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sxsw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/2011/03/16/7-things-ive-learned-at-south-by-southwest-this-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Blog lists should always be three, seven or ten items (actually I knew this already but Ned Vizzini put it in really funny terms) 2. Identity and privacy online are epic fail broken. Shit, I already knew that too. 3. Texas is dry. However much non-alcohol you think you need, drink twice that amount.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/03/16/7-things-ive-learned-at-south-by-southwest-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OAuth is really all about asking a friend if someone you want to date has cooties</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/02/14/oauth-is-really-all-about-asking-a-friend-if-someone-you-want-to-date-has-cooties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/02/14/oauth-is-really-all-about-asking-a-friend-if-someone-you-want-to-date-has-cooties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 01:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attempted humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oauth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valentines day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of Valentine&#8217;s Day&#8230; Even if you&#8217;re not a techie or a developer, you&#8217;ve probably &#8220;Logged in via Twitter&#8221; or &#8220;Connected with Facebook.&#8221; If so, the following (in very general terms) is what&#8217;s going on when you click one of those buttons. For the purposes of this exercise: Girl = User in the OAuth&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/02/14/oauth-is-really-all-about-asking-a-friend-if-someone-you-want-to-date-has-cooties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A silver lining in the new net neutrality rules?</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/04/a-silver-lining-in-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/04/a-silver-lining-in-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 03:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I put together a little primer at work on the FCC&#8217;s new net neutrality rules. As I was fact checking myself, a thought struck me&#8230; Might the new wireless rules be a politically brilliant policy disaster? Hear me out. After ISP lobbying, what is the biggest obstacle that net neutrality faces? Public opinion. Not that&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/04/a-silver-lining-in-the-new-net-neutrality-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ass-Backwardness of Our Technology, Copyright Laws and Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2010/10/14/the-ass-backwardness-of-our-technology-laws-privacy-and-copyright/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2010/10/14/the-ass-backwardness-of-our-technology-laws-privacy-and-copyright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allofmp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joel tenenbaum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oauth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider this current state of affairs&#8230; We live in an age where large corporations or their associations (think RIAA) are suing individuals and file sharing services for millions of dollars, while not making it any easier to actually, ya know, buy their copyrighted material. There are millions more dollars being spent on developing ever more&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2010/10/14/the-ass-backwardness-of-our-technology-laws-privacy-and-copyright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 00s in review, part 1, possibly of 1</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2010/01/05/the-00s-in-review-part-1-possibly-of-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2010/01/05/the-00s-in-review-part-1-possibly-of-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[00s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash sucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, since everyone is doing lists&#8230; Best moment The US electing Obama. Worst moment Katrina. Yes, it was worse than 9/11. Sorry, it just was. 9/11 may have had a more profound impact on world events and American politics, but ultimately Katrina was a far more horrifying event. (note: I realize this is a profoundly&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2010/01/05/the-00s-in-review-part-1-possibly-of-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave Reminds Me of Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2009/10/15/google-wave-reminds-me-of-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2009/10/15/google-wave-reminds-me-of-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a Google Wave invite (thanks nick) and I am remarkably unimpressed. Essentially it&#8217;s a threaded discussion system with the ability to insert different kinds of media and it works in realtime. For one thing, this is not actually new. Calling it &#8220;wave&#8221; and making it easier to include non-textual media does not make&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2009/10/15/google-wave-reminds-me-of-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jesse and Nick get deep on the future of CSS</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/23/jesse-and-nick-get-deep-on-the-future-of-css/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/23/jesse-and-nick-get-deep-on-the-future-of-css/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/23/jesse-and-nick-get-deep-on-the-future-of-css/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via IM: Jesse http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-flexbox-20090723/ nick oh man i&#8217;m not even going to bother to read that since its a 2009 draft Jesse read it its interesting nick which means its not going to happen til 2030 at earliest in IE31]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/23/jesse-and-nick-get-deep-on-the-future-of-css/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter followage pattern oddities</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/14/twitter-followage-pattern-oddities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/14/twitter-followage-pattern-oddities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/14/twitter-followage-pattern-oddities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter creates fascinating connections. I follow a few the US Men&#8217;s National Team soccer players. One of their sports marketing firms now follows me. Of course, in the context of Twitter this makes perfect sense. But in the context of the world at large it&#8217;s kind of mindblowing if you stop to think about it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/14/twitter-followage-pattern-oddities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Okay, I&#8217;m fiddling with Scala next</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/07/okay-im-fiddling-with-scala-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/07/okay-im-fiddling-with-scala-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james strachan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerome louvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scala]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sold on trying out Scala, after seeing James Strachan state: I&#8217;m very impressed with it! I can honestly say if someone had shown me the Programming Scala book by by Martin Odersky, Lex Spoon &#038; Bill Venners back in 2003 I&#8217;d probably have never created Groovy. Strachan created the very cool Groovy and is&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/07/okay-im-fiddling-with-scala-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

