<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jemery.com &#187; programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jemery.com/tag/programming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jemery.com</link>
	<description>Jesse&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>APIs should have test error endpoints</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/12/13/apis-should-have-test-error-endpoints/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/12/13/apis-should-have-test-error-endpoints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yourtrove]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the time, when you start coding against an API, either with or without an API client, you end up producing enough errors that your error-checking is fairly robust. However, sometimes most or even everything &#8220;just works.&#8221; Which produces a conundrum: You now have no idea how robust your error handling is (or is&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/12/13/apis-should-have-test-error-endpoints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Python logging tutorial &#124; Pingbacks</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/15/python-logging-tutorial-pingbacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/15/python-logging-tutorial-pingbacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the easiest-to-follow of the various Python logging guides/posts/docs that I&#8217;ve seen: Python logging tutorial &#124; Pingbacks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/15/python-logging-tutorial-pingbacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few great things to read on REST (technical)</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/06/28/a-few-great-things-to-read-on-rest-technical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/06/28/a-few-great-things-to-read-on-rest-technical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not sure how I missed this post by Jacob Kaplan-Moss, where he&#8217;s throwing the kind of REST question out there that has, in the past kept me thinking for hours: It seems like URIs like /people/{my-uid}/photos and /people/{my-uid}/photos/{photo-id} are more “pure.” But now that’s weird because only one single user ever has access to a given URI (e.g&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/06/28/a-few-great-things-to-read-on-rest-technical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hammurabi was the first programmer</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/03/09/hammurabi-was-the-first-programmer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/03/09/hammurabi-was-the-first-programmer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babylon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hammurabi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or someone working for him was. I was having dinner last night with my cousin (an SAP consultant) and we covered a range of topics, including lobbying and programming languages. And it struck us that laws are essentially programs. Either you’ve already heard this analogy or you might be going “what??!?!” But it’s true. Laws&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/03/09/hammurabi-was-the-first-programmer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My answer to What are some of the technology innovations we might see in online advertising in 2011?</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/20/my-answer-to-what-are-some-of-the-technology-innovations-we-might-see-in-online-advertising-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/20/my-answer-to-what-are-some-of-the-technology-innovations-we-might-see-in-online-advertising-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applitisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/20/my-answer-to-what-are-some-of-the-technology-innovations-we-might-see-in-online-advertising-in-2011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the two huge things that technology is changing in online advertising are 1) targeting. And 2) what I am starting to think of as &#8220;applitisements&#8221;, which is to say: display and mobile ads are going to become more and more like mini web applications. Neither of these things is a singular, momentary &#8220;innovation&#8221;&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/20/my-answer-to-what-are-some-of-the-technology-innovations-we-might-see-in-online-advertising-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Python 2.5 distutils, snow leopard and xcode making gcc happy</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2010/05/14/python-2-5-distutils-snow-leopard-and-xcode-making-gcc-happy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2010/05/14/python-2-5-distutils-snow-leopard-and-xcode-making-gcc-happy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 17:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiprocessor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xcode]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many Python folks have discovered, upgrading to Snow Leopard can cause some pain for development. For the most part, this involves reinstalling a bunch of things (macports, python itself and whatever python packages you use). This has been a hassle for me, but up until today it was just time consuming, rather than actually&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2010/05/14/python-2-5-distutils-snow-leopard-and-xcode-making-gcc-happy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Okay, I&#8217;m fiddling with Scala next</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/07/okay-im-fiddling-with-scala-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/07/okay-im-fiddling-with-scala-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james strachan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerome louvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scala]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sold on trying out Scala, after seeing James Strachan state: I&#8217;m very impressed with it! I can honestly say if someone had shown me the Programming Scala book by by Martin Odersky, Lex Spoon &#038; Bill Venners back in 2003 I&#8217;d probably have never created Groovy. Strachan created the very cool Groovy and is&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/07/okay-im-fiddling-with-scala-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiddling with neo4j</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2008/06/02/fiddling-with-neo4j/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2008/06/02/fiddling-with-neo4j/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo4j]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve been fiddling quite a bit with neo4j for an idea I had. I can say I definitely like how fast and intuitive it is to use. I&#8217;m a bit worried about storage. I created 1000 nodes with 100 relationships each and my database folder ballooned to 250 megs. That isn&#8217;t huge, but it&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2008/06/02/fiddling-with-neo4j/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qi4j</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2008/01/02/6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2008/01/02/6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composite oriented programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qi4j]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qi4j is a new framework I&#8217;ve been looking at. As my friend Nick put it, &#8220;it&#8217;s mixins for Java!&#8221; which is, well, true; but here&#8217;s the description from the site: Qi4j is a framework for domain centric application development, including evolved concepts from AOP, DI and DDD. Qi4j is an implementation of Composite Oriented Programming,&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2008/01/02/6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

