Tag politics

Is the sorry state of American education actually good for software innovation?

The following is a bit in the realm of pointless mind games and Devil’s Advocate, so grain of salt applies.

It struck me that America’s currently abhorrent state of education may, in an odd, counterproductive way actually be helping to fuel software innovation. Imagine you’re a smart student being put through the low-expectations, rote-memorization wringer that is America’s current state of public education. In other words, you’re bored senseless and completely unchallenged in school. Yet, you possess a curious mind and enjoy learning and figuring out how things work and making things that do things.

So what do you do? Well, you turn to the Internet of course. And sure, there’s Facebook and porn and sexting and reddit and political flamewars. But there’s also Wikipedia and open source software and entire datacenters of videos and blog posts about how to do things and how they work.

And you get curious and start fiddling with some of this stuff and then you start making things. And the things you make, do things. Maybe they even do useful things. And so you share them and discover that other people, even if its only one or two, find the stuff you made useful.

And suddenly you’re hooked. Now you want to make even more useful and complex and interesting things.

So, the question is: does this happen if you aren’t bored senseless at school? At some level, absolutely this question is completely irrelevant beyond the individual. But at the same time access to good programming education, fast Internet and computing equipment is no longer primarily an American or even Euro perk. We’re seeing good software and startups from all over the world.

Despite all this, there is a distinctly cultural “thing” to American software innovation. There’s a drive and passion that is more prevalent here. I’m not saying it doesn’t exist elsewhere, it absolutely does, I’m saying that this is at a critical mass in America that you don’t really see anywhere else and it irks me as to why.

I’m really not trying to be a rah rah American here (I’m attributing this on our crap education!), I think our country is a mess. But the one thing that’s undeniably working is our leadership in software innovation and I find it a curiosity that exists in spite of all our other problems.

And, of course, the easy counter to this entire argument is the volume of great stuff that comes out of Stanford, MIT and elsewhere. But there are also an awful lot of really good developers who never bothered with, or dropped out of school. And there are an awful lot of CS grads who are crap developers and even worse innovators.

GOP debt ceiling strategy: How to be greedy, stupid and crazy all at once

I’ve been struggling to put into words just how upsetting the GOP’s debt ceiling strategy really is and I think it has to be broken down into three categories:

1. It’s insanely greedy. Refusing to raise taxes on the rich while insisting on cuts to things like social services and college loans is just baldfaced class warfare. America is already too oligarchic, but these negotiating demands are a small step for Boehner and a giant leap for neofeudalism.

2. It’s stupid. It’s just dumb. I don’t know how else to say it. The economics they’re arguing make no sense whatsoever and even setting that aside, only 1 in 5 Americans agrees with their strategy.

3. Finally, let’s just say it: it’s fucking crazy. You’re going to risk sending the world economy into a depression over some tax hikes on the rich??? Really?!?!?! That’s like poisoning an entire city’s drinking water cause you got a parking ticket.

Reactions: Bin Laden’s death, compare and contrast

Okay, one other thought, via al Jazeera’s compilation of reactions to the death of Osama bin Laden. What struck me was Hamas vs. the PLA.
Hamas:

We condemn the assassination and the killing of an Arab holy warrior. We ask God to offer him mercy with the true believers and the martyrs.

We regard this as a continuation of the American policy based on oppression and the shedding of Muslim and Arab blood.

The PLA:

Getting rid of Bin Laden is good for the cause of peace worldwide but what counts is to overcome the discourse and the methods – the violent methods – that were created and encouraged by bin Laden and others in the world.

PLA spokesperson Ghassan Khatib put it better than I could.

Killing Osama: A Few Thoughts

While I don’t think killing Osama bin Laden is actually going to change much at this point for fighting terror, he and what he represented clearly occupied a good chunk of American and my own attention, to varying degrees, over the last decade. So, rather than pondering it for too long, I’m just going to try and get my three big thoughts out of my system so I can move on to much more productive things…

The Video Games are Pretty Accurate
As more operational details emerge, it’s pretty clear that this was movie and video game stuff. A top secret mission, flown under radar, with Navy SEALS dropping on to a rooftop. That’s straight out of a Tom Clancy or Call of Duty game. Freakishly so.

Woe is Our News Industry
First of all, the American news media is showing its expected ignorance and autofellatic tendencies by immediately declaring this the “biggest story since 9/11″. You know what? It’s not, get over it. Five things, off the top of my head that were bigger stories, three of which are purely American:

  1. Arab Spring. The ongoing democratic movements in the Middle East and North Africa are the single most important long-term event for world security, stability and prosperity since the fall of Communism. Period. Nothing else even comes close.
  2. America elected a black president. I didn’t think that would happen in my lifetime. I didn’t even care if we caught Osama anymore, he had been relegated to the “nice to have” category.
  3. Hurricane Katrina.
  4. The Indonesia tsunami.
  5. The Japanese earthquake.

So please, American news media, just stop it. When you’re that stupid and you self-reflect, you’re practically wrong by definition. And it’s awkward to watch, like seeing Wolf Blitzer and Geraldo Rivera examine each other’s belly button lint.

Give the Partiers a Break
I have no real issue with the people who openly celebrated Sunday night. I didn’t feel any desire to join them and I think the partying was in poor taste, but I certainly am not going to claim that I’m not pleased that Osama is dead. Hell, it made me downright happy. I would have preferred that he be brought to trial, but that was always going to be unlikely. The world is a better place without him, it just is. This is a person who believed in a brutal medieval political system (with him and his – male – buddies in charge of things, of course) that justified treating women with less respect than animals and deliberately targeting civilians. In other words, he was a petulant, spoiled bully and religious zealot who who had the resources and lived with a lack of social controls to keep him from sponsoring and promoting mass murder.

Having said all of that, I think its spurious to think that people are “celebrating death.” For several reasons:

  • We dehumanize our national enemies in order to enable ourselves to engage in conflict. This isn’t new. Just look at our portrayals of Germans or Japanese during World War II. Or of the “Russkis” during the cold war, or Communist posters about capitalist running dogs. Many Americans probably don’t see Osama as a person. He’s “the face” of the greatest single act of violence carried out against in Americans since Pearl Harbor.

  • Whether you agree or not, many Americans view the War on Terror as a war, meaning with guns and death, not like the War on Obesity. Up until the War on Terror, Americans have only ever known wars with clear goals: “take Berlin”, get a surrender, or gain independence. The War on Terror doesn’t have anything like these goals because it’s not, and never has been, a “war” in that traditional definition. Law enforcement vs. organized crime is a much better structural analogy. As such, the “victory conditions” in this conflict are human. It’s more like Killing Pablo than the Guns of Navarone. People are celebrating a victory.

  • Speaking of victories, for fuck’s sake, Americans needed a victory. If we look back at the last 10 years starting with 9/11, we’re already in a bad place. We were struck in a way we didn’t think possible and in a very visible manner. (I would still argue this had as much to do with our incompetence than with Mohammad Atta’s crack terrorism skills.) Then we got our first round of appalling corporate corruption and malfeasance with Enron, Tyco, Adelphia, etc. Then we invaded Afganistan and Iraq, both of which started out okay and quickly turned into nightmares. Next Katrina happened and it became horrifyingly clear just how bad America had gotten at taking care of its own or even operating government in a sane. Then we got another huge set of financial meltdowns and scandals that nearly sent the country and the world into a second Great Depression. Is it worth pointing out that there were space shuttle disasters, fatal infrastructure breakdowns, and a torture scandals too? So, successfully taking out Osama is the first really distinctly competent action that most Americans can wrap their head around in a long time. And let’s just point out, that not being able to find one fucking guy for 10 years, with all our national resources, really wasn’t the greatest thing ever for the national psyche, so there’s a significant relief factor going on.

  • 10 years. It feels fast if you’re over 30, maybe even 25. But for most of those young people celebrating at the White House or Ground Zero, that’s half their lives. They’ve grown up under the spectacle of 9/11 and Osama the way many of us grew up under spectacle of nuclear annihilation. In the long run I think they will look back and see that the Arab Spring had a much more positive effect on the world than the death of Osama bin Laden, but in terms of a singular event washing away years of tension, this is probably closer to that generation’s Berlin Wall.

All of which segues nicely to…

Can we please stop saying this isn’t political?
If Osama had been caught 6-18 months after 9/11, it wouldn’t have been political. But 10 years, 2 wars and over a trillion dollars of incompetence and lack of results and it’s completely, inextricably political. To be clear, I’m not calling our soldiers incompetent. Quite the opposite: if this weekend’s events have shown us anything, it’s that our soldiers and intelligence forces are exceedingly competent when provided with sensible priorities and mission parameters. Or put another way: when there aren’t a bunch of clowns running things, the American government can execute complicated, difficult tasks. I’m incredibly frustrated with Obama about many things, but at least he knows how to get something done. A lot of people noted that we got Osama on the “Mission Accomplished” anniversary, but that wasn’t the only Bush overstatement of a year. Remember “Heckuva a Job” Brownie?

The Bush Administration had eight years to find this guy. To find one criminal. Instead they used it as a big excuse to go play Risk all over the Middle East and Central Asia while underhandedly privatizing warfare and handing out no-bid contracts to their buddies for the spoils.

I can’t think of a single event that more starkly shows the difference in skill at governing than this has. It took Obama 2 years, 3 months and 11 days to right the ship and refocus America’s anti-terror priorities, all while scaling back our troop levels, and then accomplish the original goal – the original reason – that we invaded Afganistan in the first place. Remember that we gave the Taliban an ultimatum to turn over Osama bin Laden? A lot has happened between now and then.

Signs you are actually the dictator of a “democratic” country

If any of these signs apply to you, you might be a faux-President dictator…

  1. You live in a “presidential palace”
  2. Your government has a Ministry of Information
  3. Your police forces are structured nationally rather than locally
  4. You have won an election by more than 80 percent of the vote
  5. Your Ministry of the Interior has its own paramilitary forces
  6. You came to power via an “emergency”
  7. Your BFFs are generals and spies
  8. You’re constantly worried those same BFFs are going to assassinate you
  9. You have ever worn a green or brown uniform to a press event
  10. Whenever there are protests in your country, it’s because of “foreign infiltrators”
  11. You lack a vice president for multiple decades
  12. You or members of your government were trained by any of the CIA, KGB/NKVD, Mossad, ISI, or SAS (bonus points for graduates of the School of the Americas)
  13. You’ve survived multiple assassination attempts
  14. Barack Obama is embarrassed to be your friend, but George Bush calls you every weekend and mispronounces your name
  15. Buildings, bridges, dams, or ships are named after you before you die
  16. Halliburton is significant foreign corporation in your country
  17. You HATE HATE HATE the internet
  18. “Disappearance” ranks as a cause of death in your country
  19. The United States uses your prisons to torture terrorist “suspects”
  20. Your father was the last president (or your son is supposed to be the next president)
  21. China has ever used its UN Security Council veto in your favor

Got more? Leave them in the comments or @ejesse on Twitter

Weird, I actually agree with this comment from the American Enterprise Institute

Regarding the US State Department’s private vs. public efforts to support the Egyptian protestors, I just found myself in the startling position of agreeing with a statement out of AEI, via Foreign Policy:

“The real problem is that when your macro policy and your micro policy don’t match up, it takes all the credibility away,” said Danielle Pletka, vice president at the American Enterprise Institute. ” It’s one thing to stand up and say don’t shut off access to cell phones, but when top administration officials refuse to side with the protestors overall, it sends the message that there will be no consequences” for the Egyptian government if it chooses to ignore the administration’s calls for information openness

Weird.

Beck’s double standards aren’t just imagery or historical

A lot of people have posted or tweeted the tragically comic visual juxtaposition on glennbeck.com before it was scrubbed. But if you actually read the post, you’ll see the same sort of double message in the words as well. Blatantly.

The post is titled “Glenn responds to the tragedy in Arizona.” It starts off like many such official statements:

The nation was shocked this weekend by Jared Lee Loughner’s attempted assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords that left her in critical condition and six people dead, including a nine-year-old girl and a federal judge. Glenn joined the rest of the country in praying for a full recovery for the wounded and for peace and comfort for those who are grieving the loss of loved ones.

Then it babbles about what Glenn and his family were doing at the time (apparently they watch Spider-Man on their anniversary, no doubt to see whether or not one of the actors falls) and goes out of the way to mention his security staff, a comically clumsy “hey, I have security! Don’t mess with me!” mention.

The kicker, and where the double standard comes right back to life, is the last two paragraphs. The next-to-last is the offender:

Glenn said, “We must, we must look at the examples of Gandhi and Martin Luther King and Jesus Christ who, while everyone wanted violence, they stood against it. While the easy way was violence, they stood against it. They were outspoken. They had fiery words. They turned over the tables of the temple. But they were against violence. And in the end all three of them were killed. All three of them.

To quote reddit, I see what you did there. Translation: “Shit, let me talk about some peaceniks so I don’t get blamed for this…. aaaand then they got KILLED!”

Then he goes “oh shit, I went too far” and backtracks a bit:

They thought, those at the time, that their message would be silenced by violence. Somebody violent thought they could stop them with violence. And in the real end, all three of those men won.”

Of course, he mentions that all three men “won.” But he also repeats that they could be silenced with violence.

It may be toned down and more subtle, but the placement is appalling and transparent. It’s the SAME post for crying out loud!

It’s shit like this, Glenn.

A silver lining in the new net neutrality rules?

I put together a little primer at work on the FCC’s new net neutrality rules. As I was fact checking myself, a thought struck me…

Might the new wireless rules be a politically brilliant policy disaster?

Hear me out.

After ISP lobbying, what is the biggest obstacle that net neutrality faces? Public opinion. Not that public opinion is against net neutrality per se , but that net neutrality is too confusing and drowned out in the midst of unemployment, the Tea Party, Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, Wikileaks and all around apathy and ambivalence.

In other words, the American public takes it for granted, if they have been bothered to understand what it’s about at all. And what’s the best way we learn about something we take for granted?

That’s right, we take it away.

By altering the rules for wireless, the FCC is providing an testbed to show the public what it would be like if net neutrality went away while still protecting  the old, wired internet. The changes to wireless are already in motion and I am just waiting for AT&T to inform me that my (already comically expensive) plan is changing.

One has to think there will be an outcry when people starting getting hit in the  wallet just for watching a YouTube video. Will it be enough to sway against the massive lobby effort? The experience with the TSA body scanners says no, but it’s hard to tell where tipping points are, especially in mass psychology.

One can hope, and after the news cycle of the last quarter of 2010, I am trying to look on the potential bright side of things.

Followup to SCOTUS ruling, letter to congress form

A followup to last night’s rant on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. BarackObama.com has posted a form to send a letter to your local rep. It can’t hurt…

Organizing for America | BarackObama.com | Add Your Voice.

It’s time to abandon the filibuster

The Dems aren’t the ones refusing to compromise. In fact, they’re bending over backwards to try to compromise with each other and get ANY, even one or two Republican votes. No one is budging. The stakes have gotten way too high to hold to a non-legislated procedural rule.