<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jemery.com &#187; internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jemery.com/tag/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jemery.com</link>
	<description>Jesse&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Identity, SSO, and networked namespaces</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/13/identity-sso-and-networked-namespaces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/13/identity-sso-and-networked-namespaces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jud valeski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oauth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single sign on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jud Valeski had a notable observation about how potentially powerful an OS level namespace and single sign-on capability could be for internetworked applications: Everyone&#8217;s talking about the power of Twitter and Apple&#8217;s native single sign-on model in iOS 5. While this is a phenomenal coup for both Twitter and Apple, it&#8217;s only the tip of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/13/identity-sso-and-networked-namespaces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the sorry state of American education actually good for software innovation?</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/12/is-the-sorry-state-of-american-education-actually-good-for-software-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/12/is-the-sorry-state-of-american-education-actually-good-for-software-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a bit in the realm of pointless mind games and Devil&#8217;s Advocate, so grain of salt applies. It struck me that America&#8217;s currently abhorrent state of education may, in an odd, counterproductive way actually be helping to fuel software innovation. Imagine you&#8217;re a smart student being put through the low-expectations, rote-memorization wringer&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/07/12/is-the-sorry-state-of-american-education-actually-good-for-software-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My answer to What are some of the technology innovations we might see in online advertising in 2011?</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/20/my-answer-to-what-are-some-of-the-technology-innovations-we-might-see-in-online-advertising-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/20/my-answer-to-what-are-some-of-the-technology-innovations-we-might-see-in-online-advertising-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applitisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/20/my-answer-to-what-are-some-of-the-technology-innovations-we-might-see-in-online-advertising-in-2011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the two huge things that technology is changing in online advertising are 1) targeting. And 2) what I am starting to think of as &#8220;applitisements&#8221;, which is to say: display and mobile ads are going to become more and more like mini web applications. Neither of these things is a singular, momentary &#8220;innovation&#8221;&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2011/01/20/my-answer-to-what-are-some-of-the-technology-innovations-we-might-see-in-online-advertising-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ass-Backwardness of Our Technology, Copyright Laws and Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2010/10/14/the-ass-backwardness-of-our-technology-laws-privacy-and-copyright/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2010/10/14/the-ass-backwardness-of-our-technology-laws-privacy-and-copyright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allofmp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joel tenenbaum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oauth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider this current state of affairs&#8230; We live in an age where large corporations or their associations (think RIAA) are suing individuals and file sharing services for millions of dollars, while not making it any easier to actually, ya know, buy their copyrighted material. There are millions more dollars being spent on developing ever more&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2010/10/14/the-ass-backwardness-of-our-technology-laws-privacy-and-copyright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave Reminds Me of Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2009/10/15/google-wave-reminds-me-of-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2009/10/15/google-wave-reminds-me-of-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a Google Wave invite (thanks nick) and I am remarkably unimpressed. Essentially it&#8217;s a threaded discussion system with the ability to insert different kinds of media and it works in realtime. For one thing, this is not actually new. Calling it &#8220;wave&#8221; and making it easier to include non-textual media does not make&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2009/10/15/google-wave-reminds-me-of-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Jesse tries a new way of explaining DNS</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/23/where-jesse-tries-a-new-way-of-explaining-dns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/23/where-jesse-tries-a-new-way-of-explaining-dns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/23/where-jesse-tries-a-new-way-of-explaining-dns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Summary of a conversation at work&#8230; Me: &#8220;Okay, you know how in the real world every building has an address?&#8221; PersonNotGettingDNS: &#8220;Yea&#8221; Me: &#8220;Okay, the internet is like that, but on the internet you only need to know the name of a place to get to the address. So, DNS is like a cabbie. All&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2009/07/23/where-jesse-tries-a-new-way-of-explaining-dns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RMAD: Recoverable Mutually Assured Destruction, as seen first in Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.jemery.com/2009/06/19/rmad-recoverable-mutually-assured-destruction-as-seen-first-in-iran/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jemery.com/2009/06/19/rmad-recoverable-mutually-assured-destruction-as-seen-first-in-iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iranelection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recoverable mutually assured destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rmad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jemery.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assuming reasonably equal resources and knowledge: two parties attempting to knock each other off the internet can result in only two outcomes: either they both get knocked off or neither does. The possibility of either party &#8220;winning&#8221; is essentially impossible. The Internet&#8217;s combination of network redundancy and ability to communicate with, and garner assistance from,&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jemery.com/2009/06/19/rmad-recoverable-mutually-assured-destruction-as-seen-first-in-iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

