Tag facebook

The debate about social media and popular movements in the Middle East is stupid

I’ll try to make this quick, since I feel like it’s painfully obvious. Arguing either that social media “caused” these events or had “nothing to do with them” are both stupid arguments.

Clearly people are marching in the streets because they are rejecting decades of oppression, human rights violations, corruption and poverty. It’s just as clear that tools like Twitter and Facebook help people connect, communicate and organize… and… ergo, help enable popular organization. It’s just like the communications equipment assisting Solidarity in Poland. These tools are disruptive accelerators and empowerers not causers (yes, I know I just made up at least one word there).

Does anyone really think that the governments wouldn’t be trying to suppress these communication tools if they weren’t tools that worked for the people???

The Ass-Backwardness of Our Technology, Copyright Laws and Privacy

Consider this current state of affairs…

We live in an age where large corporations or their associations (think RIAA) are suing individuals and file sharing services for millions of dollars, while not making it any easier to actually, ya know, buy their copyrighted material. There are millions more dollars being spent on developing ever more complex DRM to secure said copyrighted material. Joel Tenenbaum got hit with a $675,000 ruling (note: the judge later took a zero off of that) for illegally sharing 30 songs. RIAA unsucessfully sued the Russian allofmp3.com for $1.65 trillion – yes, with ‘T’.

I don’t want to even get into the fact that this state of affairs is a shaky business strategy, that ultimately technology makes it impossible, or that the value proposition of suing everyone in sight is dubious at best (and nevermind the fact that file sharing is a free distribution channel…). Instead, let’s compare it to the flipside…

Individuals are sharing their data like crazy. More than at any point in history, people are sharing their thoughts, photos, social graph, fiction, music, videos (yes, even their porn). While many people are choosing to take advantage of better privacy settings at sites like Facebook, a lot of people are taking full advantage of how easy it is to get material into the public space. However, when indviduals do want to control the distribution of some of our content, and something goes wrong, how does the reverse look? The people who sued Google over privacy issues with Buzz? They got $2500.00 each (that’s without a ‘T’… or a ‘B’ or and ‘M’). Granted, several million dollars in the Google ruling is going to privacy organizations, and that’s a good thing, but the point is that this disparity is so totally, absurdly out of whack.

Corporations are spending gobs of money on technology, lobbyists and legal proceedings to protect themselves from (I would argue perceived rather than actual) damages. Now, of course, there are a lot of people in the technology and speculative fiction world who just sort of “get” how retarded this is and that the sell-a-physical-thing-or-sue-the-world! business model is going to eventually die and move to some sort of whuffie-based economy (assuming, of course, we aren’t all thrown back the 18th century cause of an energy crash, in which case this is all academic and hopefully I remembered to print this blog post before the lights went out).

However, that doesn’t really help the individual out right now. Individuals need better, easier to use tools to protect themselves. They also need better recourse and education. Facebook’s updates to privacy controls and industry efforts like OAuth are steps in the right direction, but we still aren’t there. Think about this: the single best set of keys you have right now to protect your online identity? Your smartphone.

Now, what would happen, for me, if this blog post was stolen a million times? How would I sue all those – wait what? Are you crazy? It would be fantastic. Please, by all means share the shit out of this.

Idea Giveaway: How to Kill the Kindle in 4 Easy Steps, No New eReader Required

I was pretty busy today, but I was able to glance long enough at my #ces column in Tweetdeck to see lots of noise about eReaders (for the record, it’s my blog and I can refuse to use the hyphen, cause I hate hyphenated tech stuff). It struck me that all these devices are a high volume of missing-the-vote-itis (that gets hyphens, keeping up?).

The Kindle seemed like the greatest thing ever when I first got mine: “I can finally read Neal Stephenson on the subway without getting neck and should cramps!!!” However, despite being a fantastic device at its launch – especially compared to, ya know, paper – the Kindle actually lacks quite a bit. So here’s my 4 easy steps to killing the Kindle (or making it a lot better, if Amazon is paying attention):

1. Make it social

This seems spectacularly obvious, and there have been a bunch of attempts to link books and social networking, but nothing has really taken off. Consider this: Why can’t you post a review of the book you just finished on your Kindle to the reviews on Amazon from your Kindle? And that’s just to start:

Why can’t you push an update that you just finished a book to Twitter and/or Facebook, from your Kindle?

Why can’t you click “Recommend this book to [your friend] ” from your Kindle?

These examples are just the beginning.

2 Drop the device

Is the Kindle hardware or software? Think about it. What really makes the Kindle work? It’s the ebook format and the wireless delivery. If you use the Kindle iPhone app you’ve probably realized this. Consumers, particularly geeks and early adopters, already have oodles of devices and there is massive craving for the iSlate or other tablets. And more importantly, all you need is the software and a device: a smartphone, a tablet even a plain old laptop or PC. You could probably launch with the following versions:

  • Windows XP/Vista/7/Mobile
  • OS X
  • iPhone
  • Android

3. Make it an open API

Guess what? If you’re selling a socially-networked, multi-device bookstore, you aren’t selling software; you’re selling books, electronically. You want that service to be exposed to as many places as possible and you want the community contributing innovation to your service. You want people integrating the next new hot web service with your service before you’ve even thought of what to do. You want it on new devices before your own employees have even heard of those devices.

And oh, by the way, wouldn’t it be cool if you were on your favorite author’s blog and they just announced their newest book was released in a post, and in that post there was a widget and all you had to do was click to buy the new book and have show up on your device of choice?

4. Give the authors a better deal

The Kindle’s pricing structure eats into the author’s share pretty harshly. Charles Stross has written about this pretty extensively and certainly knows more about the topic than I do. In addition, Amazon doesn’t do much to incentivize authors to encourage their readers to buy ebooks. In fact, the pricing structure discourages it. This is just plain silly.

Now put all these things together and what have you got?

  • You’ve got a web (HTTP technically) based store sold through heterogeneous client software
  • Your expenses are rights to the ebooks and format licensing, bandwidth and the software to run the store and handle transactions.
  • What expenses have you eliminated? For one thing, you don’t need a warehouse, either for the books or devices, which incidentally means you don’t have shipping costs.
  • And oh, by the way, unlike the Kindle, you aren’t paying for the customer’s bandwidth because they are using their own devices. You’re only paying for delivering the books, which are small, especially in comparison to other electronic products like music, movies or games.
  • You’ve provided your customers with a way to build on top of your services and integrate with future, unknown third parties.

And what have consumers got? They have ebooks that they can read on whatever device they feel like, they can share their experience with what they’ve read on whatever social network they feel like. Their favorite authors will be encouraged to interact with them in this format. And they don’t have yet another device and charger to keep track of.

Now, cue someone pointing me to where I didn’t Google enough and this already exists, cause I would really like it. Or funding it :)