Categories

Category politics

Is the sorry state of American education actually good for software innovation?

The following is a bit in the realm of pointless mind games and Devil’s Advocate, so grain of salt applies.

It struck me that America’s currently abhorrent state of education may, in an odd, counterproductive way actually be helping to fuel software innovation. Imagine you’re a smart student being put through the low-expectations, rote-memorization wringer that is America’s current state of public education. In other words, you’re bored senseless and completely unchallenged in school. Yet, you possess a curious mind and enjoy learning and figuring out how things work and making things that do things.

So what do you do? Well, you turn to the Internet of course. And sure, there’s Facebook and porn and sexting and reddit and political flamewars. But there’s also Wikipedia and open source software and entire datacenters of videos and blog posts about how to do things and how they work.

And you get curious and start fiddling with some of this stuff and then you start making things. And the things you make, do things. Maybe they even do useful things. And so you share them and discover that other people, even if its only one or two, find the stuff you made useful.

And suddenly you’re hooked. Now you want to make even more useful and complex and interesting things.

So, the question is: does this happen if you aren’t bored senseless at school? At some level, absolutely this question is completely irrelevant beyond the individual. But at the same time access to good programming education, fast Internet and computing equipment is no longer primarily an American or even Euro perk. We’re seeing good software and startups from all over the world.

Despite all this, there is a distinctly cultural “thing” to American software innovation. There’s a drive and passion that is more prevalent here. I’m not saying it doesn’t exist elsewhere, it absolutely does, I’m saying that this is at a critical mass in America that you don’t really see anywhere else and it irks me as to why.

I’m really not trying to be a rah rah American here (I’m attributing this on our crap education!), I think our country is a mess. But the one thing that’s undeniably working is our leadership in software innovation and I find it a curiosity that exists in spite of all our other problems.

And, of course, the easy counter to this entire argument is the volume of great stuff that comes out of Stanford, MIT and elsewhere. But there are also an awful lot of really good developers who never bothered with, or dropped out of school. And there are an awful lot of CS grads who are crap developers and even worse innovators.

GOP debt ceiling strategy: How to be greedy, stupid and crazy all at once

I’ve been struggling to put into words just how upsetting the GOP’s debt ceiling strategy really is and I think it has to be broken down into three categories:

1. It’s insanely greedy. Refusing to raise taxes on the rich while insisting on cuts to things like social services and college loans is just baldfaced class warfare. America is already too oligarchic, but these negotiating demands are a small step for Boehner and a giant leap for neofeudalism.

2. It’s stupid. It’s just dumb. I don’t know how else to say it. The economics they’re arguing make no sense whatsoever and even setting that aside, only 1 in 5 Americans agrees with their strategy.

3. Finally, let’s just say it: it’s fucking crazy. You’re going to risk sending the world economy into a depression over some tax hikes on the rich??? Really?!?!?! That’s like poisoning an entire city’s drinking water cause you got a parking ticket.

Reactions: Bin Laden’s death, compare and contrast

Okay, one other thought, via al Jazeera’s compilation of reactions to the death of Osama bin Laden. What struck me was Hamas vs. the PLA.
Hamas:

We condemn the assassination and the killing of an Arab holy warrior. We ask God to offer him mercy with the true believers and the martyrs.

We regard this as a continuation of the American policy based on oppression and the shedding of Muslim and Arab blood.

The PLA:

Getting rid of Bin Laden is good for the cause of peace worldwide but what counts is to overcome the discourse and the methods – the violent methods – that were created and encouraged by bin Laden and others in the world.

PLA spokesperson Ghassan Khatib put it better than I could.

Killing Osama: A Few Thoughts

While I don’t think killing Osama bin Laden is actually going to change much at this point for fighting terror, he and what he represented clearly occupied a good chunk of American and my own attention, to varying degrees, over the last decade. So, rather than pondering it for too long, I’m just going to try and get my three big thoughts out of my system so I can move on to much more productive things…

The Video Games are Pretty Accurate
As more operational details emerge, it’s pretty clear that this was movie and video game stuff. A top secret mission, flown under radar, with Navy SEALS dropping on to a rooftop. That’s straight out of a Tom Clancy or Call of Duty game. Freakishly so.

Woe is Our News Industry
First of all, the American news media is showing its expected ignorance and autofellatic tendencies by immediately declaring this the “biggest story since 9/11″. You know what? It’s not, get over it. Five things, off the top of my head that were bigger stories, three of which are purely American:

  1. Arab Spring. The ongoing democratic movements in the Middle East and North Africa are the single most important long-term event for world security, stability and prosperity since the fall of Communism. Period. Nothing else even comes close.
  2. America elected a black president. I didn’t think that would happen in my lifetime. I didn’t even care if we caught Osama anymore, he had been relegated to the “nice to have” category.
  3. Hurricane Katrina.
  4. The Indonesia tsunami.
  5. The Japanese earthquake.

So please, American news media, just stop it. When you’re that stupid and you self-reflect, you’re practically wrong by definition. And it’s awkward to watch, like seeing Wolf Blitzer and Geraldo Rivera examine each other’s belly button lint.

Give the Partiers a Break
I have no real issue with the people who openly celebrated Sunday night. I didn’t feel any desire to join them and I think the partying was in poor taste, but I certainly am not going to claim that I’m not pleased that Osama is dead. Hell, it made me downright happy. I would have preferred that he be brought to trial, but that was always going to be unlikely. The world is a better place without him, it just is. This is a person who believed in a brutal medieval political system (with him and his – male – buddies in charge of things, of course) that justified treating women with less respect than animals and deliberately targeting civilians. In other words, he was a petulant, spoiled bully and religious zealot who who had the resources and lived with a lack of social controls to keep him from sponsoring and promoting mass murder.

Having said all of that, I think its spurious to think that people are “celebrating death.” For several reasons:

  • We dehumanize our national enemies in order to enable ourselves to engage in conflict. This isn’t new. Just look at our portrayals of Germans or Japanese during World War II. Or of the “Russkis” during the cold war, or Communist posters about capitalist running dogs. Many Americans probably don’t see Osama as a person. He’s “the face” of the greatest single act of violence carried out against in Americans since Pearl Harbor.

  • Whether you agree or not, many Americans view the War on Terror as a war, meaning with guns and death, not like the War on Obesity. Up until the War on Terror, Americans have only ever known wars with clear goals: “take Berlin”, get a surrender, or gain independence. The War on Terror doesn’t have anything like these goals because it’s not, and never has been, a “war” in that traditional definition. Law enforcement vs. organized crime is a much better structural analogy. As such, the “victory conditions” in this conflict are human. It’s more like Killing Pablo than the Guns of Navarone. People are celebrating a victory.

  • Speaking of victories, for fuck’s sake, Americans needed a victory. If we look back at the last 10 years starting with 9/11, we’re already in a bad place. We were struck in a way we didn’t think possible and in a very visible manner. (I would still argue this had as much to do with our incompetence than with Mohammad Atta’s crack terrorism skills.) Then we got our first round of appalling corporate corruption and malfeasance with Enron, Tyco, Adelphia, etc. Then we invaded Afganistan and Iraq, both of which started out okay and quickly turned into nightmares. Next Katrina happened and it became horrifyingly clear just how bad America had gotten at taking care of its own or even operating government in a sane. Then we got another huge set of financial meltdowns and scandals that nearly sent the country and the world into a second Great Depression. Is it worth pointing out that there were space shuttle disasters, fatal infrastructure breakdowns, and a torture scandals too? So, successfully taking out Osama is the first really distinctly competent action that most Americans can wrap their head around in a long time. And let’s just point out, that not being able to find one fucking guy for 10 years, with all our national resources, really wasn’t the greatest thing ever for the national psyche, so there’s a significant relief factor going on.

  • 10 years. It feels fast if you’re over 30, maybe even 25. But for most of those young people celebrating at the White House or Ground Zero, that’s half their lives. They’ve grown up under the spectacle of 9/11 and Osama the way many of us grew up under spectacle of nuclear annihilation. In the long run I think they will look back and see that the Arab Spring had a much more positive effect on the world than the death of Osama bin Laden, but in terms of a singular event washing away years of tension, this is probably closer to that generation’s Berlin Wall.

All of which segues nicely to…

Can we please stop saying this isn’t political?
If Osama had been caught 6-18 months after 9/11, it wouldn’t have been political. But 10 years, 2 wars and over a trillion dollars of incompetence and lack of results and it’s completely, inextricably political. To be clear, I’m not calling our soldiers incompetent. Quite the opposite: if this weekend’s events have shown us anything, it’s that our soldiers and intelligence forces are exceedingly competent when provided with sensible priorities and mission parameters. Or put another way: when there aren’t a bunch of clowns running things, the American government can execute complicated, difficult tasks. I’m incredibly frustrated with Obama about many things, but at least he knows how to get something done. A lot of people noted that we got Osama on the “Mission Accomplished” anniversary, but that wasn’t the only Bush overstatement of a year. Remember “Heckuva a Job” Brownie?

The Bush Administration had eight years to find this guy. To find one criminal. Instead they used it as a big excuse to go play Risk all over the Middle East and Central Asia while underhandedly privatizing warfare and handing out no-bid contracts to their buddies for the spoils.

I can’t think of a single event that more starkly shows the difference in skill at governing than this has. It took Obama 2 years, 3 months and 11 days to right the ship and refocus America’s anti-terror priorities, all while scaling back our troop levels, and then accomplish the original goal – the original reason – that we invaded Afganistan in the first place. Remember that we gave the Taliban an ultimatum to turn over Osama bin Laden? A lot has happened between now and then.

Hammurabi was the first programmer

Or someone working for him was. I was having dinner last night with my cousin (an SAP consultant) and we covered a range of topics, including lobbying and programming languages. And it struck us that laws are essentially programs.

Prologue of Hammurabi's Code, in the Louvre

Either you’ve already heard this analogy or you might be going “what??!?!” But it’s true. Laws and programs are both essentially linguistic expressions of applied logic: rules and processes, codified.

A program is a law, the data is a case, and the computer is a very, very strict judge. The computer really doesn’t care about intent, it’s going to do exactly what the program says.

So, we can think of Hammurabi’s Code (even the word’s the same!) as saying stuff like this:

if convict.crimes.theft == True:
convict.hand.delete()

Of course there are differences and laws are at a bit of a disadvantage when it comes to version control and testing, but as a way for non-programmers to think of programming, you could do a lot worse than thinking of it as very strict laws.

I made the mistake of being curious about Glenn Beck’s take on events in Egypt

I must be feeling masochistic. Suffice it to say that Beck has Muslim Brotherhood  and Iran Tourettes. Whatever. What’s noteworthy is that I made a second mistake on Beck’s site. I scrolled down to the comments. And just… wow. It was like some sort of Jesus Apocaplyse Insane Asylum. I can’t do it justice, just read:

Gleen;

It is exciting to see the Scriptures coming to life! Isaiah says, 2500 years AGO.

The Brotherhood, will set up the alliance you speak about. Israel will be surrounded but not forsaken. The God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob will be faithful to a people that missed her visitation which allowed salvation to be brought to the Gentile nations through the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus, the Christ. The time of the Gentiles is fulfilled and the Kingdom of God is now going to be restored to the remnant of Israel.

He died, was buried and rose the dead so those who believe will have eternal life. Mohammed, Budda, Confucuis are in their graves but Jesus is alive. The only way to God in love, not hate.

Yes, Israel will be attacked and made lean. Damascus will be no more. Egypt will be in confusion but will eventually bow down to the God of Israel.

A one world govt. will arise and a global leader who will come in peace.

Israel will rebuild the 3rd temple.

The Gog and Magog war will be next. Rush, Russia and Marxism will join with Persia and the Islamic Brotherhood nations will come against Israel but the God of Israel will snag them back like a fishhook in their mouths as described in Ezekiel 38 and 39.

This global leader then enter the temple and declare he is god. He will incite the world to destroy Israel and 200 million army from China to meet with the nations of the world in Megedo Israel to annilate Israel. Then the day of the Lord will come to gather His people and pour out his wrath on all those who oppose the God of Israel.

Are you prepared?

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/blog/wilson/the-coming-insurrection-egypt-day-2/#comment-138541170

First off, bonus points for “Gleen.” Beyond that, there’s more crazy in here than I can process. I suppose I should be thankful that only 5 people “liked” the comment.

I’m going to go wash my eyes and frontal lobe with Purell now.

Signs you are actually the dictator of a “democratic” country

If any of these signs apply to you, you might be a faux-President dictator…

  1. You live in a “presidential palace”
  2. Your government has a Ministry of Information
  3. Your police forces are structured nationally rather than locally
  4. You have won an election by more than 80 percent of the vote
  5. Your Ministry of the Interior has its own paramilitary forces
  6. You came to power via an “emergency”
  7. Your BFFs are generals and spies
  8. You’re constantly worried those same BFFs are going to assassinate you
  9. You have ever worn a green or brown uniform to a press event
  10. Whenever there are protests in your country, it’s because of “foreign infiltrators”
  11. You lack a vice president for multiple decades
  12. You or members of your government were trained by any of the CIA, KGB/NKVD, Mossad, ISI, or SAS (bonus points for graduates of the School of the Americas)
  13. You’ve survived multiple assassination attempts
  14. Barack Obama is embarrassed to be your friend, but George Bush calls you every weekend and mispronounces your name
  15. Buildings, bridges, dams, or ships are named after you before you die
  16. Halliburton is significant foreign corporation in your country
  17. You HATE HATE HATE the internet
  18. “Disappearance” ranks as a cause of death in your country
  19. The United States uses your prisons to torture terrorist “suspects”
  20. Your father was the last president (or your son is supposed to be the next president)
  21. China has ever used its UN Security Council veto in your favor

Got more? Leave them in the comments or @ejesse on Twitter

The debate about social media and popular movements in the Middle East is stupid

I’ll try to make this quick, since I feel like it’s painfully obvious. Arguing either that social media “caused” these events or had “nothing to do with them” are both stupid arguments.

Clearly people are marching in the streets because they are rejecting decades of oppression, human rights violations, corruption and poverty. It’s just as clear that tools like Twitter and Facebook help people connect, communicate and organize… and… ergo, help enable popular organization. It’s just like the communications equipment assisting Solidarity in Poland. These tools are disruptive accelerators and empowerers not causers (yes, I know I just made up at least one word there).

Does anyone really think that the governments wouldn’t be trying to suppress these communication tools if they weren’t tools that worked for the people???

Weird, I actually agree with this comment from the American Enterprise Institute

Regarding the US State Department’s private vs. public efforts to support the Egyptian protestors, I just found myself in the startling position of agreeing with a statement out of AEI, via Foreign Policy:

“The real problem is that when your macro policy and your micro policy don’t match up, it takes all the credibility away,” said Danielle Pletka, vice president at the American Enterprise Institute. ” It’s one thing to stand up and say don’t shut off access to cell phones, but when top administration officials refuse to side with the protestors overall, it sends the message that there will be no consequences” for the Egyptian government if it chooses to ignore the administration’s calls for information openness

Weird.

Why Obama has to denounce Mubarak

Obama needs to denounce Mubarak, and soon. As of this post Egypt has cutoff all communications except land phone lines (edit: looks like the ISP Noor is still up), deployed anti-terror units, and police are setting fires to cars and public spaces. This has all the hallmarks of being setup for a massacre.

Obviously, the US can’t intervene militarily. But the US can certainly denounce Mubarak, pull US aid money and offer humanitarian aid to the Egyptian population.

This is a pivotal moment. If the US denounces Mubarak it’s a huge blow to his government and sends a message to the entire Arab world that the US supports Arab people over corrupt Arab governments. If we fail to support the protestors, then one of two things happens:

  1. The protestors are crushed. Lives are lost, the winds of reform in North Africa and the Middle East are snuffed out for decades, and the US loses any credibility with the Arab world for an entire generation. But the US keeps its “stable” “ally” in the region.
  2. The protestors, with the aid of Islamic Brotherhood somehow succeed. The US, having stood by doing nothing, essentially invites Islamicism into credibility.

If the US truly supports democracy in the Arab world the time is now to show it. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of lives are in the balance, as is the US’ role in the region, the world and history.